Alex -CONTENT:
-IS THE MESSAGE CLEAR? Yea the message is portrayed well, but it doesn’t really say much about how it affects the people watching it.
-WHAT IS IT? The movie is talking about the increased violence in our media over the last ten years.
-DO YOU AGREE WITH IT? WHY? WHY NOT?
Yes I do. We are starting to see more and more violence in the media . and it’s starting to become acceptable
EDITING:
-ARE SCENES AT THE RIGHT LENGTH?
Yes. Maybe the movie itself could be longer.
-ARE PICTURES HIGH RES?
Yes. The pictures are at a suitable resolution.
-IS THE TEXT READABLE EG SIZE, COLOUR,LAYOUT. TIME?
Maybe on the biggest text piece it could stay there for longer.
CREATIVITY
-DID IT CREATE AN EMONTIONAL RESPONSE?
Yea it did make you think about it.
- WAS IT ORIGINAL? Yep it was all written In his own words.
-WAS IT COMPOSED TO BE, ATTRACTIVE – well the pictures that were used were affective
SHOCKING- um no not really
PERSUASIVE
-no he didn’t have enough of his own opinion on the movie.
-WHAT WAS THE BEST FEATURE OF THE MOVIE? The choice of pictures was very good
Andrew.
CONTENT:
-IS THE MESSAGE CLEAR? No not really.. it only has your opinion in it. Doesn’t give much clear evidence that violence in games is ‘ok’
-WHAT IS IT? It’s a movie speaking about violence in gaming.. and how its ‘ok’ because its fake and purely for entertainment purposes.
-DO YOU AGREE WITH IT? WHY? WHY NOT? No, I don’t really agree with it because if violence in games is portrayed as ‘ok’ and ‘just for fun’ people (especially children and teens) will get the understanding that real violence is ‘ok’ and ‘just for fun’.
EDITING:
-ARE SCENES AT THE RIGHT LENGTH?
The movie itself either needs more content or a longer movie.
-ARE PICTURES HIGH RES? Most of them are suitable but some of his pictures were very pixelated.
-IS THE TEXT READABLE EG SIZE, COLOUR,LAYOUT. TIME? The text had good time, size, colour, and layout but watch out for spelling.
CREATIVITY
-DID IT CREATE AN EMONTIONAL RESPONSE? No, it didn’t have enough feeling in the movie.
- WAS IT ORIGINAL? yep.. a good creative piece.. with personal inputs.
-WAS IT COMPOSED TO BE, ATTRACTIVE. More effective than attractive.
SHOCKING. No not really.
PERSUASIVE- could have been better
-WHAT WAS THE BEST FEATURE OF THE MOVIE? Probably the choice of pictures.
David- CONTENT: good content, pictures & music.
-IS THE MESSAGE CLEAR? Yes David has a good argument at some points throughout the movie.
-WHAT IS IT? That some violence is ok. But there are a lot of cases where it is simply ‘too much’
-DO YOU AGREE WITH IT? WHY? WHY NOT? Yes I agree, Violence is increasing throughout the media and sometimes it goes way too far.
EDITING:
-ARE SCENES AT THE RIGHT LENGTH? Yes David’s scenes are a good length
-ARE PICTURES HIGH RES? Most of the pictures are really clear. And perfect resolution. Couple that could be better.
-IS THE TEXT READABLE EG SIZE, COLOUR,LAYOUT. TIME? Yes, the text was very good.. extremely comfortable to read.
CREATIVITY:
-DID IT CREATE AN EMONTIONAL RESPONSE? No, not for me.
- WAS IT ORIGINAL? Had a couple of pictures the same as the other boys , but all the writing was david’s own thoughts so yes.
-WAS IT COMPOSED TO BE, ATTRACTIVE. Very good pictures
SHOCKING. No not really
PERSUASIVE. Umm could have been better.
-WHAT WAS THE BEST FEATURE OF THE MOVIE? The pictures and the music.
Excellent critiques Erin, really well thought out responses and good insight into the features, good points and failures of the other movies. Well done.
Joe. CONTENT:
-IS THE MESSAGE CLEAR? No not really..
-WHAT IS IT? That what you watch influences the way you and your children behave
-DO YOU AGREE WITH IT? WHY? WHY NOT? yes I do.. Because it’s true.
EDITING:
-ARE SCENES AT THE RIGHT LENGTH? Yes they are
-ARE PICTURES HIGH RES? Only a few are good resolution the rest are pretty dodgy.
-IS THE TEXT READABLE EG SIZE, COLOUR,LAYOUT. TIME? Yeah the text is good.
CREATIVITY:
-DID IT CREATE AN EMONTIONAL RESPONSE? No not really. The shows that he picked as example’s aren’t very strong examples to use.
- WAS IT ORIGINAL? Yes it was..
-WAS IT COMPOSED TO BE, ATTRACTIVE. Yep it worked.
SHOCKING no not really.
PERSUASIVE, yes it was ok
-WHAT WAS THE BEST FEATURE OF THE MOVIE? Maybe the scene timing, and text.
-WHAT IS IT? That if you take in lustful media it will affect you on a higher scale than you think.
-DO YOU AGREE WITH IT? WHY? WHY NOT? Yes I do. Because society is becoming worse as inappropriate media becomes more acceptable
EDITING:
-ARE SCENES AT THE RIGHT LENGTH? Yes.
-ARE PICTURES HIGH RES? All the pictures were very clear
-IS THE TEXT READABLE EG SIZE, COLOUR,LAYOUT. TIME? Yeah maybe some too long. But better too long than short.
CREATIVITY:
-DID IT CREATE AN EMONTIONAL RESPONSE? No not after watching about ten of them you don’t really focus on that. If I had watched it first though it would.
- WAS IT ORIGINAL? Yes.
-WAS IT COMPOSED TO BE, ATTRACTIVE well attractive with a message
SHOCKING make you wake up to yourself. And think
PERSUASIVE not really just shows consequences of your actions -WHAT WAS THE BEST FEATURE OF THE MOVIE? The pictures and the message.
Kyle -CONTENT:
-IS THE MESSAGE CLEAR? No not really its more of an opinion
-WHAT IS IT? That violence in gaming is ‘ok’ as it is fake.
-DO YOU AGREE WITH IT? WHY? WHY NOT? To a certain extent. Sometimes it’s over the top.
EDITING:
-ARE SCENES AT THE RIGHT LENGTH? yes
-ARE PICTURES HIGH RES? The pictures are of very good quality
-IS THE TEXT READABLE EG SIZE, COLOUR,LAYOUT. TIME? Yes it is. The writing is comfortable to read.
CREATIVITY:
-DID IT CREATE AN EMONTIONAL RESPONSE? Umm no.
- WAS IT ORIGINAL? Yes..
-WAS IT COMPOSED TO BE, ATTRACTIVE- appealing
SHOCKING nope.
PERSUASIVE- more of a choice..
-WHAT WAS THE BEST FEATURE OF THE MOVIE?
The pictures and the music was well suited.
-WHAT IS IT? That violence (real or fake) is everywhere and it impacts children
-DO YOU AGREE WITH IT? WHY? WHY NOT? Yes I do. Its true
EDITING:
-ARE SCENES AT THE RIGHT LENGTH? umm yeah
-ARE PICTURES HIGH RES? Most of the pictures are at a good resolution but some of them aren’t
-IS THE TEXT READABLE EG SIZE, COLOUR,LAYOUT. TIME? Readable, the green is a bit bright..spelling is dodgy.
CREATIVITY:
-DID IT CREATE AN EMONTIONAL RESPONSE? no
- WAS IT ORIGINAL? Yeah it was
-WAS IT COMPOSED TO BE, ATTRACTIVE yes.
SHOCKING a little in some aspects
PERSUASIVE trying a little
-WHAT WAS THE BEST FEATURE OF THE MOVIE? Umm the music
-WHAT IS IT? That violence is completely wrong and that what you take in has bad consequences
-DO YOU AGREE WITH IT? WHY? WHY NOT? yes I do.. its true. And its wrong
EDITING:
-ARE SCENES AT THE RIGHT LENGTH? yes
-ARE PICTURES HIGH RES? The pictures are very high quality
-IS THE TEXT READABLE EG SIZE, COLOUR,LAYOUT.TIME? yes the text was at good speed and colour to be able to read
CREATIVITY:
-DID IT CREATE AN EMONTIONAL RESPONSE? Yes it actually did. It’s a deep movie
- WAS IT ORIGINAL?yes
-WAS IT COMPOSED TO BE, ATTRACTIVE. To an extent
SHOCKING yes
PERSUASIVE an yes
-WHAT WAS THE BEST FEATURE OF THE MOVIE? That fact that Morgan used a real event (columbine killings) to get her point across.. and effective music
Nick CONTENT:
-IS THE MESSAGE CLEAR? No not really
-WHAT IS IT? It only says violence is everywhere. Not that it affects us
-DO YOU AGREE WITH IT? WHY? WHY NOT? Nothing to agree with
EDITING:
-ARE SCENES AT THE RIGHT LENGTH? yes
-ARE PICTURES HIGH RES? yes very good choice of pictures to.
-IS THE TEXT READABLE EG SIZE, COLOUR,LAYOUT. TIME? Yes. One typo in “normal”
CREATIVITY:
-DID IT CREATE AN EMONTIONAL RESPONSE? To an extent could have been better
- WAS IT ORIGINAL? yes
-WAS IT COMPOSED TO BE, ATTRACTIVE yes
SHOCKING yes
PERSUASIVE I think so but no actual words to back up the point
-WHAT WAS THE BEST FEATURE OF THE MOVIE? The pictures of real life violence and how its seen to be cool.
-WHAT IS IT? That violence is on the increase and isn’t acceptable. And children are growing up in a violent environment
-DO YOU AGREE WITH IT? WHY? WHY NOT? yes I do because its true.
EDITING:
-ARE SCENES AT THE RIGHT LENGTH? yes. maybe 1st one bit long
-ARE PICTURES HIGH RES? Yes. Good pictures
-IS THE TEXT READABLE EG SIZE, COLOUR,LAYOUT. TIME? Yep.
CREATIVITY:
-DID IT CREATE AN EMONTIONAL RESPONSE? Some of the pictures did yes
- WAS IT ORIGINAL?yes
-WAS IT COMPOSED TO BE, ATTRACTIVE to an extent
SHOCKING yes
PERSUASIVE and yes
-WHAT WAS THE BEST FEATURE OF THE MOVIE? the fact that Quinny used cartoons and real people to explain this.
Alex -CONTENT:
-IS THE MESSAGE CLEAR? Yea the message is portrayed well, but it doesn’t really say much about how it affects the people watching it.
-WHAT IS IT? The movie is talking about the increased violence in our media over the last ten years.
-DO YOU AGREE WITH IT? WHY? WHY NOT?
Yes I do. We are starting to see more and more violence in the media . and it’s starting to become acceptable
EDITING:
-ARE SCENES AT THE RIGHT LENGTH?
Yes. Maybe the movie itself could be longer.
-ARE PICTURES HIGH RES?
Yes. The pictures are at a suitable resolution.
-IS THE TEXT READABLE EG SIZE, COLOUR,LAYOUT. TIME?
Maybe on the biggest text piece it could stay there for longer.
CREATIVITY
-DID IT CREATE AN EMONTIONAL RESPONSE?
Yea it did make you think about it.
- WAS IT ORIGINAL? Yep it was all written In his own words.
-WAS IT COMPOSED TO BE, ATTRACTIVE – well the pictures that were used were affective
SHOCKING- um no not really
PERSUASIVE
-no he didn’t have enough of his own opinion on the movie.
-WHAT WAS THE BEST FEATURE OF THE MOVIE? The choice of pictures was very good
Andrew.
CONTENT:
-IS THE MESSAGE CLEAR? No not really.. it only has your opinion in it. Doesn’t give much clear evidence that violence in games is ‘ok’
-WHAT IS IT? It’s a movie speaking about violence in gaming.. and how its ‘ok’ because its fake and purely for entertainment purposes.
-DO YOU AGREE WITH IT? WHY? WHY NOT? No, I don’t really agree with it because if violence in games is portrayed as ‘ok’ and ‘just for fun’ people (especially children and teens) will get the understanding that real violence is ‘ok’ and ‘just for fun’.
EDITING:
-ARE SCENES AT THE RIGHT LENGTH?
The movie itself either needs more content or a longer movie.
-ARE PICTURES HIGH RES? Most of them are suitable but some of his pictures were very pixelated.
-IS THE TEXT READABLE EG SIZE, COLOUR,LAYOUT. TIME? The text had good time, size, colour, and layout but watch out for spelling.
CREATIVITY
-DID IT CREATE AN EMONTIONAL RESPONSE? No, it didn’t have enough feeling in the movie.
- WAS IT ORIGINAL? yep.. a good creative piece.. with personal inputs.
-WAS IT COMPOSED TO BE, ATTRACTIVE. More effective than attractive.
SHOCKING. No not really.
PERSUASIVE- could have been better
-WHAT WAS THE BEST FEATURE OF THE MOVIE? Probably the choice of pictures.
David- CONTENT: good content, pictures & music.
-IS THE MESSAGE CLEAR? Yes David has a good argument at some points throughout the movie.
-WHAT IS IT? That some violence is ok. But there are a lot of cases where it is simply ‘too much’
-DO YOU AGREE WITH IT? WHY? WHY NOT? Yes I agree, Violence is increasing throughout the media and sometimes it goes way too far.
EDITING:
-ARE SCENES AT THE RIGHT LENGTH? Yes David’s scenes are a good length
-ARE PICTURES HIGH RES? Most of the pictures are really clear. And perfect resolution. Couple that could be better.
-IS THE TEXT READABLE EG SIZE, COLOUR,LAYOUT. TIME? Yes, the text was very good.. extremely comfortable to read.
CREATIVITY:
-DID IT CREATE AN EMONTIONAL RESPONSE? No, not for me.
- WAS IT ORIGINAL? Had a couple of pictures the same as the other boys , but all the writing was david’s own thoughts so yes.
-WAS IT COMPOSED TO BE, ATTRACTIVE. Very good pictures
SHOCKING. No not really
PERSUASIVE. Umm could have been better.
-WHAT WAS THE BEST FEATURE OF THE MOVIE? The pictures and the music.
Excellent critiques Erin, really well thought out responses and good insight into the features, good points and failures of the other movies. Well done.
Joe. CONTENT:
-IS THE MESSAGE CLEAR? No not really..
-WHAT IS IT? That what you watch influences the way you and your children behave
-DO YOU AGREE WITH IT? WHY? WHY NOT? yes I do.. Because it’s true.
EDITING:
-ARE SCENES AT THE RIGHT LENGTH? Yes they are
-ARE PICTURES HIGH RES? Only a few are good resolution the rest are pretty dodgy.
-IS THE TEXT READABLE EG SIZE, COLOUR,LAYOUT. TIME? Yeah the text is good.
CREATIVITY:
-DID IT CREATE AN EMONTIONAL RESPONSE? No not really. The shows that he picked as example’s aren’t very strong examples to use.
- WAS IT ORIGINAL? Yes it was..
-WAS IT COMPOSED TO BE, ATTRACTIVE. Yep it worked.
SHOCKING no not really.
PERSUASIVE, yes it was ok
-WHAT WAS THE BEST FEATURE OF THE MOVIE? Maybe the scene timing, and text.
Belinda
CONTENT:
-IS THE MESSAGE CLEAR? Yes..
-WHAT IS IT? That if you take in lustful media it will affect you on a higher scale than you think.
-DO YOU AGREE WITH IT? WHY? WHY NOT? Yes I do. Because society is becoming worse as inappropriate media becomes more acceptable
EDITING:
-ARE SCENES AT THE RIGHT LENGTH? Yes.
-ARE PICTURES HIGH RES? All the pictures were very clear
-IS THE TEXT READABLE EG SIZE, COLOUR,LAYOUT. TIME? Yeah maybe some too long. But better too long than short.
CREATIVITY:
-DID IT CREATE AN EMONTIONAL RESPONSE? No not after watching about ten of them you don’t really focus on that. If I had watched it first though it would.
- WAS IT ORIGINAL? Yes.
-WAS IT COMPOSED TO BE, ATTRACTIVE well attractive with a message
SHOCKING make you wake up to yourself. And think
PERSUASIVE not really just shows consequences of your actions -WHAT WAS THE BEST FEATURE OF THE MOVIE? The pictures and the message.
Kyle -CONTENT:
-IS THE MESSAGE CLEAR? No not really its more of an opinion
-WHAT IS IT? That violence in gaming is ‘ok’ as it is fake.
-DO YOU AGREE WITH IT? WHY? WHY NOT? To a certain extent. Sometimes it’s over the top.
EDITING:
-ARE SCENES AT THE RIGHT LENGTH? yes
-ARE PICTURES HIGH RES? The pictures are of very good quality
-IS THE TEXT READABLE EG SIZE, COLOUR,LAYOUT. TIME? Yes it is. The writing is comfortable to read.
CREATIVITY:
-DID IT CREATE AN EMONTIONAL RESPONSE? Umm no.
- WAS IT ORIGINAL? Yes..
-WAS IT COMPOSED TO BE, ATTRACTIVE- appealing
SHOCKING nope.
PERSUASIVE- more of a choice..
-WHAT WAS THE BEST FEATURE OF THE MOVIE?
The pictures and the music was well suited.
Lachlan-CONTENT:
-IS THE MESSAGE CLEAR? Yea
-WHAT IS IT? That violence (real or fake) is everywhere and it impacts children
-DO YOU AGREE WITH IT? WHY? WHY NOT? Yes I do. Its true
EDITING:
-ARE SCENES AT THE RIGHT LENGTH? umm yeah
-ARE PICTURES HIGH RES? Most of the pictures are at a good resolution but some of them aren’t
-IS THE TEXT READABLE EG SIZE, COLOUR,LAYOUT. TIME? Readable, the green is a bit bright..spelling is dodgy.
CREATIVITY:
-DID IT CREATE AN EMONTIONAL RESPONSE? no
- WAS IT ORIGINAL? Yeah it was
-WAS IT COMPOSED TO BE, ATTRACTIVE yes.
SHOCKING a little in some aspects
PERSUASIVE trying a little
-WHAT WAS THE BEST FEATURE OF THE MOVIE? Umm the music
Laura.E.-CONTENT:
-IS THE MESSAGE CLEAR? yes
-WHAT IS IT? That lust happens a lot and that you can get help for it. ”you’re not alone’’
-DO YOU AGREE WITH IT? WHY? WHY NOT? Um I’m not sure. There isn’t really anything to agree or disagree with
EDITING:
-ARE SCENES AT THE RIGHT LENGTH? yes
-ARE PICTURES HIGH RES? Yes the pictures are good
-IS THE TEXT READABLE EG SIZE, COLOUR,LAYOUT. TIME? yes
CREATIVITY:
-DID IT CREATE AN EMONTIONAL RESPONSE? No, not personally
- WAS IT ORIGINAL? Yes..
-WAS IT COMPOSED TO BE, ATTRACTIVE yes
SHOCKING yes
PERSUASIVE – more of an outreach
-WHAT WAS THE BEST FEATURE OF THE MOVIE? Pictures and nice font
Morgan CONTENT:
-IS THE MESSAGE CLEAR? yes
-WHAT IS IT? That violence is completely wrong and that what you take in has bad consequences
-DO YOU AGREE WITH IT? WHY? WHY NOT? yes I do.. its true. And its wrong
EDITING:
-ARE SCENES AT THE RIGHT LENGTH? yes
-ARE PICTURES HIGH RES? The pictures are very high quality
-IS THE TEXT READABLE EG SIZE, COLOUR,LAYOUT.TIME? yes the text was at good speed and colour to be able to read
CREATIVITY:
-DID IT CREATE AN EMONTIONAL RESPONSE? Yes it actually did. It’s a deep movie
- WAS IT ORIGINAL?yes
-WAS IT COMPOSED TO BE, ATTRACTIVE. To an extent
SHOCKING yes
PERSUASIVE an yes
-WHAT WAS THE BEST FEATURE OF THE MOVIE? That fact that Morgan used a real event (columbine killings) to get her point across.. and effective music
Nick CONTENT:
-IS THE MESSAGE CLEAR? No not really
-WHAT IS IT? It only says violence is everywhere. Not that it affects us
-DO YOU AGREE WITH IT? WHY? WHY NOT? Nothing to agree with
EDITING:
-ARE SCENES AT THE RIGHT LENGTH? yes
-ARE PICTURES HIGH RES? yes very good choice of pictures to.
-IS THE TEXT READABLE EG SIZE, COLOUR,LAYOUT. TIME? Yes. One typo in “normal”
CREATIVITY:
-DID IT CREATE AN EMONTIONAL RESPONSE? To an extent could have been better
- WAS IT ORIGINAL? yes
-WAS IT COMPOSED TO BE, ATTRACTIVE yes
SHOCKING yes
PERSUASIVE I think so but no actual words to back up the point
-WHAT WAS THE BEST FEATURE OF THE MOVIE? The pictures of real life violence and how its seen to be cool.
Quentin -CONTENT:
-IS THE MESSAGE CLEAR? yea
-WHAT IS IT? That violence is on the increase and isn’t acceptable. And children are growing up in a violent environment
-DO YOU AGREE WITH IT? WHY? WHY NOT? yes I do because its true.
EDITING:
-ARE SCENES AT THE RIGHT LENGTH? yes. maybe 1st one bit long
-ARE PICTURES HIGH RES? Yes. Good pictures
-IS THE TEXT READABLE EG SIZE, COLOUR,LAYOUT. TIME? Yep.
CREATIVITY:
-DID IT CREATE AN EMONTIONAL RESPONSE? Some of the pictures did yes
- WAS IT ORIGINAL?yes
-WAS IT COMPOSED TO BE, ATTRACTIVE to an extent
SHOCKING yes
PERSUASIVE and yes
-WHAT WAS THE BEST FEATURE OF THE MOVIE? the fact that Quinny used cartoons and real people to explain this.